Current
Visitors
7
COVER PAGE
PREVIOUS
DISPLAY
 Related Articles
7MFARM.COM
AVOIDING VACCINATION KNOTS
B S E IN A FRENCH GOAT?
B S E UPDATE 2006-01-23
BACK TO BASICS ~ VACCINATIONS
BIO - AGENT PARASITE CONTROL
BLOAT
CAE
CAE - NEW TEST
CASEOUS LYMPHADENITIS (CL)
CASTRATING
CATTLE TB
CHLAMYDIA ABORTION
CL - CONFIRMED
CL - WHAT & HOW
COMMON DISEASES
CUT-N-TACKUP IN THE BARN
DIARRHEA
DRAWING A GOAT'S BLOOD
EXTERNAL PARASITES
F A T G O A T S
FALL BREEDING
FIXING FOLDED EARS
FLOPPY KID SYNDROME
FMD INFORMATION
GAMBLING ON THE MARKET
GOAT MEDICINES
GONE FISHING
HOOF ROT
HOOF TRIMMING
JOHNE'S DISEASE CHROMOSOMES
KEEP IT CLEAN - DISINFECTANTS
LISTERIOSIS FACT SHEET
LIVESTOCK STRESS
MAXIMIZING VACCINE BENEFITS
MEAT GOAT HOME STUDY COURSE ANNOUNCED BY PENN STATE
MED EQUIPMENT
MEXICAN CATTLE WATCH!
MORE B S E TESTING
NORTH AMERICAN BSE CONFERENCE
OFF LABLE USE OF ANIMAL MEDICATIONS
ORF - SOREMOUTH
OUR GOATS' WORST ENEMY
PLANT POISIONING
POISONOUS PLANTS
Q FEVER
QUARANTINE - DEER & ELK
QUARTERLY SHEEP & GOAT HEALTH REPORT
RECOGNIZING SOREMOUTH
REPORT ANIMAL HEALTH PROBLEMS
SCRAPIE - TEXAS PROPOSED RULE
SELENIUM MAP(SAANENDOAH.COM)
SHEEP & GOAT HEALTH REPORT
SWINE INFLUENZA INFORMATION
TAHC EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
TAHC PRESS RELEASE - ANTHRAX
TAHC PRESS RELEASE - FMD
TAKE CARE OF THE LGDS
TB BULL - TAHC ASKS FOR HELP!
TEXAS SCRAPIE REQUIREMENTS
TICK FEVER QUARANTINE
UNRINARY CALCULI - WORST ENEMY
URINARY CALCULI
V S CONFIRMED IN TEXAS
VACCINATION
VACCINATION FAILURE
VACCINE HANDLING
VACCINE QUALITY ASSURANCE
VACCINE STORAGE
WHAT IS FAMACHA?
WHAT IS M U M S ?
WINTER MANAGEMENT
WYOMING TO TEXAS HAULING
Artie McDonald
Deer Creek Farms Boer Goats
Kokomo, Indiana
Fullbloods and Percentages
http://deercreekboer.homestead.com/goat.html

New C.A.E. Test
by
Keith Smith
Thanks to Artie McDonald for sending in the lead about this article.
12/05/2000

CAE, Caprine Arthritis Encephalitis, a virus, has long been a thorn in the side of meat and milk producers. This disease impacts the bottom line through lost production due to arthritis, progressive paresis, and other neurologic and musculoskeletal disfunction. Testing has traditionally been directed toward detection of serum antibodies produced by the goat's immune system.

The University of Colorado has recently completed a comparison of serologic diagnosis (using the usual AGID testing kits) to genome level testing for CAE. This new test is known as polymerase chain reaction or "PCR". The following information is extracted and developed from their web site article on this issue http://www.cvmbs.colostate.edu/dlab/webdocs/general/lablines7.pdf.

Please note that the link above provides a PDF file and that a pdf reader such as the free Adobe Acrobat Reader must be installed on your computer to view the file.

The investigation team sampled groups of animals from four infected sheep herds and performed both tests.

Number of Animals in Results Categories Comparing AGID to PCR for OPP/CAE Diagnosis
  PCR Test Results
Positive Negative
AGID
Test
Results
AGID Positive 38 5
AGID Negative 4 26
An animal was considered positive only if either PCR or AGID gave positive results.

PCR detected 4 sheep that were AGID negative.
AGID detected 5 sheep that were PCR negative.

The study criteria resulted in a PCR sensitivity of 89 percent and an AGID sensitivity of 91 percent. Neither test detected all infected animals.

The recommendations of the report writer, Jim Collins, are
  • For eradication and control purposes, both tests should be used.
  • AGID screening could be performed first since it is less expensive, followed by PCR testing of the negative animals.
  • Multiple testing of animals (at least two) should be performed with either test over a period of several months.

Fees and sample submission guidelines:
AGID test: $5.00 - Submit one ml (cc) serum.
PCR test: $22.00 - Submit blood in EDTA tube.

Now... past all the technical stuff - Opinion of the editor:
The new test seems to be an adjunct to, not a replacement for, the existing method. The study sample size was just barely sufficient to obtain statistically significant results.
The significance of the results could be placed in question by the "justifications" given for the false negatives of both methods.

  • The four (4) AGID false negatives were justified by stating that the subject animals had reduced antibody levels due to age.
  • The five (5) PCR false negatives were justified by stating that other viruses might have the same genetic sequences.
The existing test, though less expensive, was more accurate than the new evaluation method.
It seems inappropriate to this writer that a test should be touted as an improvement in method over one which performed better in the laboratory study.

The use of the PCR test as a secondary level of testing seems valid for highly suspect herds where the anticipated level of infection is high.
In commercial herds that have a lower risk the cost of "back up" testing with the PCR method would be prohibitive except for the most highly valued animals.

Breeding stock, show animals, and dairy production goats, however, present an entirely different level of concern. The purchase of these higher valued animals should be accompanied by every possible assurance that they are free from disease of any kind. I would recommend that such animals be tested utilizing both methods before purchase. If the seller does not provide the service the buyer would be wise to shoulder the cost themselves.

The results of the study belie the title of the University of Colorado report. "Eradication of OPP or CAE..." does not seem a good choice for the title of a report showing no improvement over pervious methods. With 26 of 73 highly suspect study animals showing negative results in both tests we have a long journey ahead of us before we achieve "eradication".

30

 

DISCLAIMER

GoatGateway.com and it's agents and sponsors are not responsible for the content of advertisers' sites or advertised claims.

GoatGateway.com does not act as an agent for buyers or sellers. GoatGateway.com does not in any way influence or control transactions for goods or services between buyers and sellers.

USE

Information on this web site is offered by persons who are NOT veterinary professionals except where noted.
The information contained on this web site is based on the knowledge and understanding of the author at the time of first publication. However, because of advances in agriculture related fields, users are reminded of their personal responsibility to ensure that information upon which they rely is up to date and to CHECK accuracy and currency of the information WITH YOUR VETERINARIAN for specific health and nutrition advice.

ALWAYS READ THE LABEL
Users of medical and chemical products must always read the label and strictly comply with directions on the label. Users are not absolved from compliance with the directions on the label by reason of any statement made, or omitted to be made, on this web site.

TRADEMARKS

The boergoats.com logo is a registered trademark of KLS Boer Goats.
The following are trademarks or service marks of KLS Boer Goats.

OnLine Show
GoatGateway
BoerGoats.com
MeatGoats.com
GoatClassifieds
ShowMeatGoats
ShowWethers.net
BoerGoat101.com
GoatBreeders.com
BoerGoats.comCHAT
The Show Wether Center
Where The Bucks Meet The Bucks
The Boer & Meat Goat Information Center